Finding an RSD lawyer with appropriate knowledge and experience is essential for patients who wish to pursue an RSD lawsuit. An RSD lawyer must be well-versed in federal and state laws surrounding an RSD lawsuit. Additionally, the lawyer should have a firm understanding of RSD and what the condition entails. Generally speaking, the more specific RSD experience an attorney has, the more ease he or she will have in navigating the legal process. In turn, this may increase the chances of a successful case.
RSD Lawyer Experience
Finding an RSD lawyer with knowledge of the condition is particularly important due to the widespread misunderstanding of RSD. In general, RSD is often misunderstood by the medical community. This misunderstanding is often amplified in law. An RSD lawyer with sufficient experience handling these types of cases is more equipped to handle the intricacies that are particular to RSD law.
An RSD lawyer is more equipped to obtain and provide information to the court regarding:
- The medical records necessary for the court to recognize and understand the scope of the client’s condition
- Needs, expectations, and shortcomings in RSD diagnosis treatment, with specific relation to the client’s case
- Testimony from expert witnesses, who are critical for communicating RSD issues in relation to the client’s condition
Resources and Connections
Patients should focus on finding an RSD lawyer who has appropriate resources and connections in the RSD arena. For example, the lawyer should obtain expert testimony from a relevant medical professional. The testimony of this medical professional is important to building a strong case. Therefore, it is important to obtain a top-notch medical professional with extensive knowledge and experience dealing with RSD patients. Lawsuits will also require extensive research and understanding of RSD. A lawyer with access to high-quality RSD resources is often much better suited for the intricacies of the legal process.
Importance of Understanding RSD
While all medical lawsuits require extensive medical literature and evidence, RSD cases are typically more complex. This issue may be especially complex in cases where the patient’s RSD does not exhibit “textbook” symptoms that are clear-cut and readily observable. This is often the case, as the condition varies among afflicted patients. Therefore, RSD lawyers face a heightened responsibility to gather, analyze, and present medical information to the court.
Quality of Evidence
The quality and thoroughness of medical evidence is key in an RSD lawsuit. The plaintiff, or RSD patient filing the lawsuit, holds the burden of proof in an RSD lawsuit. This means that he or she is faced with the responsibility of providing sufficient evidence for the case
The plaintiff’s case must prove that the patient has RSD and that it significantly impacts the patient in some way. The plaintiff must also prove that the condition was caused by the negligence or malice of the defendant, or the party being sued. When supporting a case, it is critical to provide the best information possible to represent the severity of the client’s condition.
Patients should focus on finding an RSD lawyer with an “open door policy.” The lawyer should be available for consultation, compassion, and support for the patient. The legal process is complex and often confusing and overwhelming. For this reason, patients should be sure they are finding an RSD lawyer who is willing to address their questions, concerns, and needs throughout the legal process.
When researching and considering lawyers, the patient should ask questions about the attorney’s availability and responsiveness. When consulting with the potential attorney and staff members, patients should be mindful of certain tendencies and behaviors that may indicate how they treat their clients. Long response times, ignoring communications, and lack of good customer service may serve as warning signs that clients may not receive sufficient care and attention.
Abadia-Barrero, Cesar, et al. “Errors in medical interpretation: our concerns for public health and a call for caution.” Pediatrics June 2003: 1495+. Academic OneFile. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Alper, Brian S., and Charles J. Zelnick. “CRPS (reflex sympathetic dystrophy).” Cortlandt Forum 1 June 2006: 67+. Academic OneFile. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.